Moments when a piece of entertainment completely lost you.
Moderator: Moderators
-
Draco_Argentum
- Duke
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
You got the chromosomes around the wrong way.Koumei wrote:And I'm not exactly sure what you want, if you dislike a system where X has to impress Y so that Y will consent to sex with X. Would you prefer X to declare "I think I will have sex with you" and Y has to shut up and take it?
It'd be better if Y had to impress X. Exactly why the tools who gave women all the crap jobs didn't lump asking for dates along with it is beyond me.
-
PhoneLobster
- King
- Posts: 6403
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Oh, yeah. I have another one to contribute:
The TV show Ghost Whisperer.
I don't know how far it's spread, so for the non-U.S. section of the Den, I'll explain.
It centers around a woman. Who can see and talk to ghosts. It apparently runs in her family. And she chooses to use the ability to help ghosts pass on (who stay for a variety of reasons--can't make peace, have something important they want to do, whatever.)
Sometimes they can get nasty. And to be able to help them, she has to understand their problems.
Sometimes it's just sappy, sometimes it's genuinely scary (like the one with Bloody Mary).
And then...It jumped the shark.
Spoiler coming--sorta.
The TV show Ghost Whisperer.
I don't know how far it's spread, so for the non-U.S. section of the Den, I'll explain.
It centers around a woman. Who can see and talk to ghosts. It apparently runs in her family. And she chooses to use the ability to help ghosts pass on (who stay for a variety of reasons--can't make peace, have something important they want to do, whatever.)
Sometimes they can get nasty. And to be able to help them, she has to understand their problems.
Sometimes it's just sappy, sometimes it's genuinely scary (like the one with Bloody Mary).
And then...It jumped the shark.
Spoiler coming--sorta.
Okay, the woman had a husband/boyfriend. He got shot and died. And he hung around as a ghost for a few weeks to say his good-byes and all that. Should have been a set-up for a touching scene where he makes his peace and goes into the light or whatever.
Except he didn't do that. He was waiting around for someone to die without being too banged up. And, finally, it happened. A man died in a car crash. He vacated his body and moved on. Hubby jumped into the body--and the body woke up.
And even though this guy doesn't have any of his memories now, the old personality is reasserting itself.
And, let's be clear, this woman has put herself through emotional hell and no small amount of physical danger, all in the name that spirits must move on. Hanging around after you die only causes problems.
There is no single act I could think of that would be more against everything she's worked at for years. She should have vomited in revulsion and then picked up a piece of broken glass and shivved him.
But, no, she's awestruck, and her normal friends all eventually accept the truth: She has another chance with her One True Luv, and not a single person calls out the inconsistency.
If there were any justice in media, the Dahaka from PoP: Warrior Within would show up and flatten the guy.
Except he didn't do that. He was waiting around for someone to die without being too banged up. And, finally, it happened. A man died in a car crash. He vacated his body and moved on. Hubby jumped into the body--and the body woke up.
And even though this guy doesn't have any of his memories now, the old personality is reasserting itself.
And, let's be clear, this woman has put herself through emotional hell and no small amount of physical danger, all in the name that spirits must move on. Hanging around after you die only causes problems.
There is no single act I could think of that would be more against everything she's worked at for years. She should have vomited in revulsion and then picked up a piece of broken glass and shivved him.
But, no, she's awestruck, and her normal friends all eventually accept the truth: She has another chance with her One True Luv, and not a single person calls out the inconsistency.
If there were any justice in media, the Dahaka from PoP: Warrior Within would show up and flatten the guy.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
-
Lago PARANOIA
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
That sort of reminds me about the episodes of Kathryn Janeway's holographic boyfriend, whom she was prepared to risk the ship to save.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
-
RandomCasualty2
- Prince
- Posts: 3295
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 4:22 pm
I like to make fun of Crissa for a variety of reasons (chief amongst them being: it's funny), but she's right on this point. It is frowned upon in some cultures. I was actually throwing a half-hearted slipperyslope/strawman insult at Count by implying he thinks rape is the way to go, when he didn't say that.
That being said, the grin suggests RC was joking.
That being said, the grin suggests RC was joking.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
I actually finally saw Batman Returns during last nights shift. It was playing over the network and I had nothing else to look at.
I'm not sure when it really got to me. I know the penguin army was when I really gave up. I think the targetted batarang was where it got me. And then the funeral progression for the Penguin.
So yeah. Old movie I never watched, kind of wish I hadn't seen it now.
I'm not sure when it really got to me. I know the penguin army was when I really gave up. I think the targetted batarang was where it got me. And then the funeral progression for the Penguin.
So yeah. Old movie I never watched, kind of wish I hadn't seen it now.
-
Lago PARANOIA
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
I love Agony Booth, but every time I read the associated forum thread for a movie and see anything posted by Albert I die a little bit inside.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
-
TavishArtair
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
The grin could also suggest, Koumei, "I like the thought of that." To wit, the real reason certain topics are off-limits for joking is so that you don't look like an asshole when you make the joke, as it requires more flair and panache than most people have.
Batman Returns was awesome and sexy with its Selina Kyle, and hilarious with its Penguin. I watched it as a kid, it's great. Ultimately, like any comic book, it will disappoint you if you take it too seriously.
Batman Returns was awesome and sexy with its Selina Kyle, and hilarious with its Penguin. I watched it as a kid, it's great. Ultimately, like any comic book, it will disappoint you if you take it too seriously.
-
Lago PARANOIA
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
So. Goldstein's Book. Nineteen Eighty Four.
To me, that was the best part of the entire fuckin novel. While the first and third acts are equally good, Goldstein's Book is one of the best things I have ever had the pleasure of reading.
But everyone else I have talked to really, really hated that part, even if they enjoyed the rest of the book. I mean, I know the entire book is basically George Orwell's thinly-veiled case for democratic socialism but I can't be the only person who found the digression fascinating.
To me, that was the best part of the entire fuckin novel. While the first and third acts are equally good, Goldstein's Book is one of the best things I have ever had the pleasure of reading.
But everyone else I have talked to really, really hated that part, even if they enjoyed the rest of the book. I mean, I know the entire book is basically George Orwell's thinly-veiled case for democratic socialism but I can't be the only person who found the digression fascinating.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
You know what? I'm fucking done with these stupid white kid power fantasies. It's fucking up our movies.
So many of these movies coming out today - like Transformers - are about some white kid (it's somehow important that he's white) is born to do something, but is otherwise unremarkable. Does nothing useful throughout his life until the story, then throughout the entire movie or story - and in fact, the story might be better without him in it.
And what's worse is like - in Transformers - the kid power fantasy has nothing to do with the real plot of the movie. That he exists, maybe, but most of the film wasted on him? Nope. The end of the movie is either decided by the hand of the writer or it was never really in question.
I got Wanted today, and the movie was awesome except for this stupid kid.
ARGH.
I'm gonna hafta swear off western movies if this keeps happening.
-Crissa
So many of these movies coming out today - like Transformers - are about some white kid (it's somehow important that he's white) is born to do something, but is otherwise unremarkable. Does nothing useful throughout his life until the story, then throughout the entire movie or story - and in fact, the story might be better without him in it.
And what's worse is like - in Transformers - the kid power fantasy has nothing to do with the real plot of the movie. That he exists, maybe, but most of the film wasted on him? Nope. The end of the movie is either decided by the hand of the writer or it was never really in question.
I got Wanted today, and the movie was awesome except for this stupid kid.
ARGH.
I'm gonna hafta swear off western movies if this keeps happening.
-Crissa
Last edited by Crissa on Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
violence in the media
- Duke
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:18 pm
The hell?
Ok, I haven't seen the entirety of Transformers, but I can't recall anything in there stressing importance about Sam being white. Same thing with Wesley in Wanted. I mean, yeah, the characters and actors are white, but so what? Would either of those movie plots be more acceptable, assuming nothing else were changed, if those parts were played by John Leguziamo and will Smith?
Ok, I haven't seen the entirety of Transformers, but I can't recall anything in there stressing importance about Sam being white. Same thing with Wesley in Wanted. I mean, yeah, the characters and actors are white, but so what? Would either of those movie plots be more acceptable, assuming nothing else were changed, if those parts were played by John Leguziamo and will Smith?
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
That's how my ex was. If she wanted it and I didn't, she threw a fit. Then again, I don't think I ever asked her for sex once when she said yes. I'm glad that I've had at least one decent romantic encounter since then, even though I'm tired of putting up with her shit I do now know that I can in fact have a positive experience in a romantic situation.Koumei wrote:...I don't think that's what Crissa is saying.
And I'm not exactly sure what you want, if you dislike a system where X has to impress Y so that Y will consent to sex with X. Would you prefer X to declare "I think I will have sex with you" and Y has to shut up and take it?
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
If I was a chick, I'd totally be into you.Koumei wrote:I like to make fun of Crissa for a variety of reasons (chief amongst them being: it's funny), but she's right on this point. It is frowned upon in some cultures. I was actually throwing a half-hearted slipperyslope/strawman insult at Count by implying he thinks rape is the way to go, when he didn't say that.
That being said, the grin suggests RC was joking.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Because I could tell when someone was joking and out-and-out said "This comment here is a strawman, designed to poke fun at you!" (thus reducing the effectiveness, of course) or because I make fun of Crissa?
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
A little of both. Unfortunately for you, I have the wrong genitals.Koumei wrote:Because I could tell when someone was joking and out-and-out said "This comment here is a strawman, designed to poke fun at you!" (thus reducing the effectiveness, of course) or because I make fun of Crissa?
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
-
RandomCasualty2
- Prince
- Posts: 3295
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 4:22 pm
Well I figure you'd probably be into her regardless, she just kinda wouldn't be into you.Count_Arioch_the_28th wrote:If I was a chick, I'd totally be into you.Koumei wrote:I like to make fun of Crissa for a variety of reasons (chief amongst them being: it's funny), but she's right on this point. It is frowned upon in some cultures. I was actually throwing a half-hearted slipperyslope/strawman insult at Count by implying he thinks rape is the way to go, when he didn't say that.
That being said, the grin suggests RC was joking.
I know a lot of lesbians that have awesome personalities. Just makes you wish you could find one who was into guys. Well... until you realize that it's impossible by definition.
Last edited by RandomCasualty2 on Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cielingcat
- Duke
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
With a lot of work, that can be fixed.Count_Arioch_the_28th wrote:A little of both. Unfortunately for you, I have the wrong genitals.Koumei wrote:Because I could tell when someone was joking and out-and-out said "This comment here is a strawman, designed to poke fun at you!" (thus reducing the effectiveness, of course) or because I make fun of Crissa?
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
I'll pass. I am all for anyone changing their body however they please, but my cock is a masterpiece. Getting rid of it would be like slapping God in the face. Possible with my severed penis. My penis stays where it is.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
-
Lago PARANOIA
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
This conversation is getting Freudian and creepy. Can we talk about something other than weird gender fetishism, like... like... how The Shield's suck factor kind of took us by surprise?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.

